Seven letters to Antwerp Atty. Gen. Christine Dekkers unanswered














Home | Page Title | Page Title





 
Fears for fate of loved one as Antwerp officials refuse to answer requests for assistance in a family's search
 
 
Attorney General's intransigeance dates to May 2005
 
 




























The following letter was sent to the highest legal authority in Antwerp, Belgium, Christine Dekkers, Attorney General (Procureur Generaal) of Antwerp, by telefax on June 20, 2006 and by ordinary airmail from Thailand on June 22, 2006.

 

This was the seventh letter to Ms. Dekkers in 14 months.

  

There has been no reply to the correspondence or any indication that it has received due and proper consideration.

 

 

75/9 Non Pa Sang

Pha Khao District

Loei Province 42240

Thailand

Tel.: 66 – 1 – 965 – 1493; 66 – 1 – 220 - 6598 (for Lao and Thai);

  66  -  4 – 726 – 4836 (for Dutch, English, French)

Email: thanomchokjanphen@yahoo.com

Website: http://thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com

 

Tuesday, June 20, 2006

 

Personal

 

Mrs. Christine Dekkers (Mevrouw Christine Dekkers)

Attorney General (Procureur-Generaal)

Attorney General’s Office (Hof van Beroep te Antwerpen)

Waalse Kaai

2000 Antwerp (Antwerpen)

Belgium (België)

 

Subject: Attorney General’s assistance essential in search for loved one

 

Madame:

 

I refer to six letters, sent to you on May 3, 2005; July 6, 2005; September 16, 2005; November 15, 2005; January 12, 2006; and April 12, 2006.

 

The correspondence requested your cooperation in a Thai family's search for a loved one, Oliver Albert Chanyut Chokjanphen, last reported to be in Antwerp. The family fears for Oliver Chanyut’s physical safety. If alive, he is 17 years old. 

 

There has been no reply from you or any indication that the request received due consideration.

 

School, city administration, police, judicial, welfare and so-called “non-governmental organization” officials in Antwerp conspired to commit fraud and obstruct the family’s efforts to trace and contact Oliver Chanyut. School employees, in conspiracy with federal policemen, are stealing mail and messages for Oliver Chanyut from the family. Belgian postal officials are not complying with official Thai postal inquiries.

 

Please order the police to put Oliver Chanyut in direct telephone contact with his family.

 

On behalf of the Chokjanphen family, I am,

 

Sincerely yours,

 

Signature

 

William Champa 

 

 

----------------------------

 

 

View published sites:

 

Request to Attorney General of Antwerp, Christine Dekkers, for Contact with Loved One, May 3, 2005: http://thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com/openlettertotheattorneygeneralofantwerpbelgium/

 

A Second Open Letter to the Attorney General of Antwerp, Christine Dekkers, July 6, 2005: http://thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com/asecondopenlettertotheattorneygeneralofantwerp/ 

 

A Third Open Letter to the Attorney General of Antwerp, Christine Dekkers, September 16, 2005:
http://thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com/athirdopenlettertotheattorneygeneralofantwerp

 

A Fourth Letter to the Attorney General of Antwerp, Christine Dekkers, November 15, 2005:

http://thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com/fourthlettertochristinedekkersattorneygeneralofantwerp/

 

Fifth Unanswered Letter to the Attorney General of Antwerp, Christine Dekkers, January 12, 2006:

http://thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com/fifthunansweredlettertochristinedekkersattorneygeneralofantwerpbelgium 

 

Attorney General Dekkers Ignores Sixth Urgent Letter, April 12, 2006:

http://thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com/christinedekkersigoressixurgentrequestsfromfamilytosavechild/

 

Seventh letter to Attorney General of Antwerp, Christine Dekkers, Unanswered, June 20, 2006:

http://thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com/sevenletterstoantwerpattygenchristinedekkersunanswered

 

__________

 

 

Websites with relevant up-to-date information:

 

http://thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com/antwerpcityofficialsrefusemothersrequestforchildsoficialresidence ;

 

http://jameschampa.tripod.com/cityemployeesinantwerpstealingmail/ ;

 

http://thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com/mailforloveoneintercepted ;

 

http://jameschampa.tripod.com/fraudbyantwerpofficials/






Christine Dekkers
dekkers.jpg
Attorney General of Antwerp, Belgium

No Response by the Attorney General of Antwerp to Seven Urgent Requests! 

 

The attorney general of Antwerp can always act directly. The attorney general has done so before. That would be by far the most effective way to handle a matter involving the international traffic in children and pedophile rings, especially in Antwerp.

 

The attorney general's office could contact the city police directly and request that it put a child in immediate telephone contact with his family. Indeed, that would be the most effective way to respond to a family's request for contact with a loved one that has been repeatedly refused by city officials.

 

Following routine procedure, the attorney general could refer the requests to an assistant attorney general. However, an assistant attorney general, Marc Tack, who was once an assistant prosecuting attorney in Antwerp's juvenile court, ignored many similar requests addressed to him in 2004. Other assistant attorney generals mishandled the requests when they were assistant prosecuting attorneys in Antwerp's main courthouse.

 

In fact, referral of this matter by the attorney general to anyone else would be "passing the buck" and a clear signal to dispose of it through routine procedures, in effect, to ignore the family's requests and to invent excuses for not cooperating with the family, to write false reports about the child, and to stir up complaints against the child’s family and possibly murder the child to destroy incriminating evidence. 

 

It is likely that the attorney general referred the family's requests to the prosecuting attorney for Antwerp. While that can be considered standard routine procedure, it would be inappropriate in this particularly urgent and long-neglected matter.

 

The prosecuting attorney, or his secretary, would refer the family's letters to an assistant prosecuting attorney.

 

The assistant prosecuting attorney would have three options:

 

(1) Order the police to put the child in immediate telephone contact with his family;

 

(2) Refer the requests to a judge of instruction who, in turn, would

 

    (a) Order the city police to find the child or

 

    (b) Refer the matter back to the prosecutor;

 

(3) Refer the requests to assistant prosecuting attorneys in the juvenile court.

 

Referral of the urgent requests to assistant prosecuting attorneys in the juvenile court would be a further signal to ignore them and, further, to cover up the matter.

 

The assistant prosecuting attorneys in the juvenile court could follow one of three routines:

 

(1) Refer the requests to the juvenile division of the city police.

 

The chief of the juvenile division, Sonja DeBrynt, would refer the requests to social workers with the juvenile division of the city police who would contact local city school employees and ask for information about the child and then report back to the chief of the juvenile division who would report back to the assistant prosecuting attorney at the juvenile court.

 

(2) Refer the letters to the Provincial Department of Social Services where social workers would contact school employees and request information about the child and report back to the prosecutor.

 

Social workers and directors of the Provincial Department of Social Services have long been notorious for erratic and immature behavior, violent displays of anger in public, utter lack of decent manners, general dishonesty and unreliability. Some have been reported to have close links to pedophile, prostitution and child trafficking rings.

 

(3) Refer the requests to social workers in the juvenile court. The social workers would go to the school and visit the child’s living quarters and then report directly to a judge in the juvenile court with a recommendation to put the child in telephone contact with his family.

 

The attorney general might have requested written reports from policemen and/or social workers that would excuse her intransigence. 

 

It is possible also that Dekkers has conflicts of interests in this matter and that she herself might be complicit in the kidnapping and trafficking of Oliver Chanyut.

 

The Belgian Federal Minister of Justice, Marc Verwilghen, and the Federal Minister of Interior, Antoine Duquesne, ignored related correspondence for several years. In 2003, they wrote false reports about Oliver Chanyut to persons inquiring at the family's behest. Their reports might have been prepared, in part, with the attorney general of Antwerp.

 

In 2004, Verwilghen's successor, Laurette Onkelinx, as Minister of Justice, and Duquesne's successor, Patrick Dewael, as Minister of Interior, ignored repeated requests to order Antwerp officials to cooperate with the family. The attorney general of Antwerp, by peddling false reports, might have offered them an excuse for their intransigence.

 

Click here for a smapling of correspondence with the Belgian Federal Ministry of Interior: http://thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com/correspondencewiththebelgianfederalministriesofinteriorandjustice

 

It is possible also that Dekkers, to cover cronies, is ignoring the matter in the hope of taking advantage of statutes of limitation. Earlier, many court officials seemed to believe that by blocking any court decision in this particular case they would prevent the family from complaining to the European Court of Human Rights which will not accept complaints without a court decision in the state concerned within the previous six months. 

 

For a sampling of correspondence with the Belgian Federal Ministry of Justice, click here: ____________________

 

For a sampling of correspondence with the Belgian Federal Prime Minister, Guy Verhofstadt, click here: ____________________































Full name:
Email address:
Comment: