Christine Dekkers Igores Six Urgent Requests from Family to Save Child














Home | Page Title





 

 

This website is posted in the hope that it will lead to the recovery of a victim of traffickers in women and children.

 

All police services and private individuals with any knowledge of Oliver Albert Chanyut Chokjanphen (AKA Chanyut Vermeulen, Channy Vermeulen, DJ Channy and DJ Chavvy), age 24, born in Thailand on February 28, 1989, and last seen in Belgium, are urged to contact this website and/or his family at once as indicated: Tel.: 66 - 08 4 726 4836; 66 - 08 - 6024 - 7032. Or jamesonrosemont@yahoo.com

 

Belgian and Thai police services were complicit in kidnapping and trafficking the victim, obstructed search and recovery efforts and have been in all ways wholly uncooperative and unreliable since then. The Thai police intimidated complainants and witnesses and threatened their physcial safety. There is overwhelming documentary evidence of their persistent criminal conduct.

 

The last trace of the victim was the listing of an address and telephone number in the name of Chanyut Vermeulen in Zondhoven, Belgium on two Belgian telephone company Internet websites in mid-October 2013. He is unknown at the telephone number, which is in another town, and there has been no response to the letters sent to the address. 

 

It is believed that the victim is surrounded by bad company and unaware of the Internet posting. 

Call home!

66 - 85 - 756 – 5799

66 - 81 - 052 - 0698

66 - 87 - 214 - 1383

This is your mother's cell phone

(24 hours round the clock)

 

(At the number 66 - 04 - 726 4836 there are persons

prepared to answer in Dutch, English, French, German,

Lao and Thai.)

Thai Family Fears Officials Hiding Severe Injuries or Death of Boy Trafficked to Belgium

photo
dekkers.jpg
Christine Dekkers, Attorney General of Antwerp

There has been absolutely no response from Christine Dekkers, Attorney General of Antwerp, Belgium, to six urgent requests from the Chokjanphen family in Thailand, sent between May 3, 2005 and April 12, 2006, for immediate contact by telephone with a loved one, Chanyut Chokjanphen, a child who was trafficked to Belgium by an international pedophile and prostitution ring operating in Belgium and Thailand.
 
The family has received no notification about the fate of a loved one
 




























Sixth Letter to Christine Dekkers, Attorney General of Antwerp, Belgium, April 12, 2006, sent by telefax and airmail on the same day.

 

 

The letter requests the cooperation and assistance of the Attorney General of Antwerp, the highest legal authority in the provicne, in a Thai family's search for a loved one who was trafficked and kidnapped with the complicity Belgian authorities who are obstructing search and recovery efforts. 

 

 

75/9 Non Pa Sang

Pha Khao District

Loei Province 42240

Thailand

Tel.: 66 – 1 – 965 – 1493; 66 – 1 – 220 - 6598 (for Lao and Thai);

  66  -  4 – 726 – 4836 (for Dutch, English, French)

Email: thanomchokjanphen@yahoo.com

Website: http://thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com

 

April 12, 2005

 

Personal

 

Mrs. Christine Dekkers (Mevrouw Christine Dekkers)

Attorney General (Procureur-Generaal)

Attorney General’s Office (Hof van Beroep te Antwerpen)

Waalse Kaai

2000 Antwerp (Antwerpen)

Belgium (België)

 

Subject: Attorney General’s assistance required to find minor

 

Madame:

 

I refer to five letters sent to you on May 3, July 6, September 16, November 15, 2005 and January 12, 2006.

 

Each letter concerned a Thai family's search for a loved one, a seventeen-year-old boy, Oliver Albert Chanyut Chokjanphen, last reported to be in Antwerp, and requested your cooperation and assistance in finding him.

 

There was no reply to the correspondence or any indication that it received consideration.

 

Because school, city administration, police and judicial officials in Antwerp are uncooperative (see enclosure) an order from the attorney general's office to the police to put Oliver Chanyut in direct telephone contact with his family is urgently required.

 

Mrs. Thanomjit was separated from Oliver Chanyut when she returned to Thailand several years ago and prevented by the Thai authorities from returning to Belgium. Oliver Chanyut has called a neighbor several times from Belgium in efforts to contact his mother. The family tried to reach Oliver Chanyut through Belgian and Thai acquaintances and the Belgian and Thai authorities in both countries, all to no avail. School employees continue to steal all mail and messages.

 

The family fears for Oliver Chanyut’s physical safety.

 

Legal counsels advised that Thanomjit, as Oliver’s Chanyut’s sole surviving parent, is the only person with the right to custody and care. Mrs. Thanomjit has not authorized anyone else to care for him. Any claim to otherwise is fraudulent and criminal and should be prosecuted.

 

Please order the police to put Oliver Chanyut in direct telephone contact with his family.

 

This letter will be posted on an advertised internet website if there is no response or indication that this matter has received consideration.

 

On behalf of the Chokjanphen family, I am,

 

Sincerely yours,

 

signature

 

William Champa 

 

Enclosure (1)

 

 

---------------------------

 

 

Websites with relevant up-to-date information:

 

http://thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com/antwerpcityofficialsrefusemothersrequestforchildsoficialresidence ;

 

http://jameschampa.tripod.com/cityemployeesinantwerpstealingmail/ ;

http://thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com/mailforloveoneintercepted ;

 

http://jameschampa.tripod.com/fraudbyantwerpofficials/

 

 

View published sites:

 

Request to Attorney General of Antwerp, Christine Dekkers, for Contact with Loved One, May 3, 2005: http://thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com/openlettertotheattorneygeneralofantwerpbelgium/

 

A Second Open Letter to the Attorney General of Antwerp, Christine Dekkers, July 6, 2005: http://thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com/asecondopenlettertotheattorneygeneralofantwerp/ 

 

A Third Open Letter to the Attorney General of Antwerp, Christine Dekkers, September 16, 2005:
http://thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com/athirdopenlettertotheattorneygeneralofantwerp

 

A Fourth Letter to the Attorney General of Antwerp, Christine Dekkers, November 15, 2005:

http://thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com/fourthlettertochristinedekkersattorneygeneralofantwerp/

 

Fifth Unanswered Letter to the Attorney General of Antwerp, Christine Dekkers, January 12, 2006:

http://thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com/fifthunansweredlettertochristinedekkersattorneygeneralofantwerpbelgium 

 

Attorney General Dekkers Ignores Sixth Urgent Letter, April 12, 2006:

http://thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com/christinedekkersigoressixurgentrequestsfromfamilytosavechild/

 

Seventh letter to Attorney General of Antwerp, Christine Dekkers, Unanswered, June 20, 2006:

http://thanomchokjanphen.tripod.com/sevenletterstoantwerpattygenchristinedekkersunanswered

 

 






No response by the Attorney General of Antwerp to Six Urgent Requests 

 

The attorney general of Antwerp, Christine Dekkers, can act directly in this matter. The attorney general has acted directly before in other matters. That would be by far the most effective way to handle the matter, especially in Antwerp.

 

Otherwise, the attorney general could refer the requests to an assistant attorney general with instructions to handle the matter.

 

The attorney general's office could contact the city police directly and request that it put the child in immediate telephone contact with his family. Indeed, that would be the most effective way to handle the matter.

 

It is more likely, however, that the attorney general referred the letters to the prosecuting attorney for Antwerp. Unfortunately, while that is can be considered standard routine procedure, it would not be appropriate to this particularly urgent and long neglected situation.

 

Referral of this matter to the prosecuting attorney would be an obvious signal to treat the matter through routine procedures, in effect, to ignore the requests, to invent excuses for not complying with them, to write false reports about the child and to stir up complaints against the child’s family and possibly murder the child to destroy incriminating evidence. 

 

The prosecuting attorney, or his secretary, would refer the letters to an assistant prosecuting attorney.

 

The assistant prosecuting attorney would have three options:

 

(1) to order the police to put the child in immediate telephone contact with his family;

 

(2) to refer the requests to a judge of instruction who in turn would (a) order the city police to find the child or (b) refer the matter back to the prosecutor;

 

(3) to refer the requests to assistant prosecuting attorneys in the juvenile court.

 

Referral of the urgent letters to the assistant prosecuting attorneys in the juvenile court would be a further signal to ignore them and to cover up.

 

The assistant prosecuting attorneys in the juvenile court could follow one of three routines:

 

(1) to refer the requests to the juvenile division of the city police.

 

The chief of the juvenile division, Sonja DeBrynt, would refer the requests to social workers with the juvenile division of the city police who would contact local city school employees and ask for information about the child and then report back to the chief of the juvenile division who would report back to the assistant prosecuting attorney at the juvenile court.

 

(2) to refer the letters to the provincial department of social services where social workers would contact school employees and request information about the child and report back to the prosecutor.

 

Social workers and directors of the provincial department of social services are notorious for erractic behavior, violent displays of anger in public, utter lack of decent manners, general dishonesty and unreliabilty. Some have been reported to have close links to pedophile, prostitution and trafficking rings.

 

(3) to refer the requests to social workers in the juvenile court. The social workers would go to the school and visit the child’s living quarters and then report directly to a judge in the juvenile court with a recommendation to put the child in telephone contact with his family.

 

It appears most likely that the attorney general decided not to act on the requests. Referring them to others would be a sure signal to ignore them and would be understood especially as a request for written reports from policemen and/or social workers that would excuse her intransigence. 

 

 




























Enter supporting content here